Wreck Removal: 2007 Convention enters into force on 14th April 2015
The International Convention on the Removal of Wrecks, adopted at a Diplomatic Conference organised by the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) in Nairobi in 2007, will enter into force on 14th April 2015, 12 months after ten states have ratified it. Those 10 States are: Bulgaria, Denmark, Germany, India, Iran, Malaysia, Morocco, Nigeria, Palau and the United Kingdom.
The Convention applies only to wrecks located in the Member States' Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). However a Member State may choose to extend the scope of the Convention to its own territory, including its territorial sea.
Ships of 300 GT or more which fly the flag of a Member State or use a port or offshore facility in the territory of a Member State will be required to have insurance or other financial security in place to meet the liabilities arising under the Convention.
The registered owner is liable for the costs of locating, marking and removing a wreck which constitutes a hazard posing a danger to navigation or may reasonably be expected to have major harmful consequences for the marine environment or damage to the coastline or related interests.
Liability is strict and subject only to three limited defences applicable, namely that the casualty
(a) resulted from act of war, hostilities, civil war, insurrection, or a natural phenomenon of an exceptional, inevitable and irresistible character;
(b) was wholly caused by an act or omission done with intent to cause damage by a third party; or
(c) was wholly caused by the negligence or other wrongful act of any Government or other authority responsible for the maintenance of lights or other navigational aids
Wreck includes any object which is or has been on board the ship.
The Convention does not affect the shipowner's right to limit liability under any applicable national or international regime. The regime which commonly applies is the Limitation Convention 1976, either in its original form or as amended by the 1996 Protocol. In either case, States are entitled to make a reservation excluding wreck removal from the category of claims subject to limitation.Resources:
IMO Press release:Wreck-removal convention to enter into force Shipowner liability on the horizon as Denmark ratifies international instrumentFor further enquiries:
Please contact our legal services team:
Dr Chao Wuchao.firstname.lastname@example.org
T: +44 20 7204 2157
INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION, Nairobi, 14-18 May 2007, Agenda item 8 (306 KB)
You may also be interested in:
Japan accedes to the Bunker Convention and the Wreck Removal Convention, in force from 1 October 2020
These Conventions will enter into force for Japan on 1st October, 2020.
Myanmar - Time Bars
As commerce, including international commerce, starts to grow in Myanmar, there will be many cases in which a contract gives rise to a dispute between the parties to it. The question whether a Myanmar Court will or should adjudicate a contract dispute but if it does adjudicate, the rules which tell it whether to apply the domestic law of Myanmar, or the Myanmar rules of private international.
Malaysia - Time Bars
In Malaysia, the principal act of limitation is set out in the Limitation Act 1953 ("the Act") basically based on the English Limitation Act 1939 which was since then replaced with the Limitation Act 1980. The Act prescribes different period of limitation depending on different types of causes of action that arise. The Act cautions that nothing therein shall operate as a bar to any action or proceedings unless expressly pleaded.