Import VAT Recovery of a customs debt
The Information Paper (97) 56 sets out the rules which apply for import VAT purposes. The principle of Direct and Indirect Representation also applies. As a consequence a Direct Representative makes a Customs declaration in another's name on the person's behalf. The person on whose behalf the declaration is made is the declarant and the debtor and the only person who will be pursued for import VAT debts. Conversely an Indirect Representative makes a declaration in his own name, but on behalf of a principal (the importer). An Indirect Representative should bear in mind that acting in that capacity may carry commercial risks as he and his principal are jointly and severally liable for any import VAT debt.
For Customs duty purposes the person entitled to repayment is the person who paid the duties as a customs debtor to satisfy the customs debt. For import VAT purposes, however, repayment will only be made in accordance with section 80 of the VAT Act 1994. That section provides that subject to the defence of unjust enrichment repayment is liable to be made to the person who paid an amount to the Commissioners which was not VAT due. In this context an agent would be unjustly enriched if the money being claimed had already been paid to him by an importer, or the importer had promised to pay him, but had not yet done so.
Every payment is by cash or cash equivalent, such as a bank draft, the person who tended the monies or presented the bank draft may claim repayment of the amount overpaid. If payment is made be a FAS, or deferment account, the owner of the account is the person entitled to repayment. More detailed information is available in Paper (97) 56.
For more information, see the link:
http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/customs/procedural_aspects/general/debt/index_en.htmTags
You may also be interested in:
On 17 March 2022 the UK Government published a General Trade Licence in part to clarify earlier amendments to the UK Russia (Sanctions) (EU Exit) Regulations (the “Regulation”). Specifically, the licence addresses the issue as to whether it is lawful under the Regulation for insurers and reinsurers domiciled or operating from the United Kingdom to provide insurance for vessels calling at Russian ports or transiting Russian territorial waters.
At their meeting on 7th February 2022, the Directors reviewed the basis on which special war risks P&I cover could be made available to Members in accordance with the proviso to Rule 5E.
China’s “New” Export Control Law
30/12/2020
On 17 October 2020, the Standing Committee of China’s National People’s Congress (SCNPC) passed the Export Control Law of the People’s Republic of China (the “ECL”) and the same entered into force on 1st December 2020.
The Sinking of the Titanic
12/10/2021
In this short article, the Club takes a look back one of the most notorious historical incident in maritime history, the sinking of Titanic; this casualty gives us the opportunity to examine the reported facts, to reflect and understand human error and avoid those mistakes from being repeated that others have made.