Arrest Convention 1999
1. The General Assembly of the United Nations, by resolution 52/182 of
18 December 1997, endorsed the convening of a Diplomatic Conference in order to
consider and adopt a convention on arrest of ships.
2. The United Nations/International Maritime Organization Diplomatic
Conference on Arrest of Ships was convened at Geneva from 1 to 12 March 1999.
3. Representatives from the following States participated in the Conference:
Algeria, Angola, Argentina, Australia, Belarus, Belgium, Benin, Brazil, Bulgaria,
Burundi, Cameroon, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, Côte d’Ivoire, Croatia, Cuba,
Cyprus, Denmark, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Estonia,
Ethiopia, Finland, France, Gabon, Gambia, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Greece,
Guinea, Haiti, Honduras, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Iran (Islamic Republic of),
Iraq, Israel, Italy, Japan, Kenya, Latvia, Lebanon, Liberia, Lithuania,
Madagascar, Malta, Marshall Islands, Mauritania, Mexico, Monaco, Morocco,
Mozambique, Netherlands, Nigeria, Norway, Pakistan, Panama, Peru, Philippines,
Poland, Portugal, Republic of Korea, Romania, Russian Federation, Senegal,
Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Sweden,
Switzerland, Syrian Arab Republic, Thailand, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia,
Turkey, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom of Great Britain and
Northern Ireland, United Republic of Tanzania, United States of America, Uruguay,
Viet Nam, and Yemen.
4. Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China and Macao, associate
members of the International Maritime Organization, were represented by
5. The following intergovernmental organizations were represented by an
observer: Arab Labour Organization, Organization of African Unity, Organization
of American States, Organization of the Islamic Conference, Intergovernmental
Organization for International Carriage by Rail.
6. The following non-governmental organizations were represented by an
observer: general category: International Chamber of Commerce, International
Confederation of Free Trade Unions, World Federation of United Nations
Associations; special category: International Ship Suppliers Association,
International Association of Ports and Harbours, Latin American Association of
Navigational Law and Law of the Sea, International Chamber of Shipping, Comité
Maritime International, Institute of International Container Lessors, IberoA/
American Institute of Maritime Law, International Group of P&I Clubs,
International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources.
7. The Conference elected the following officers:
President: Mr. Zhu Zengjie (China)
Vice-Presidents: Mrs. Ida Barinova (Russian Federation)
Mr. Marc Gauthier (Canada)
Mr. Mykola Maimeskul (Ukraine)
Mr. Mahmoud Bahey Eldin Ibrahim Nasrah (Egypt)
Mr. Eladio Peñaloza (Panama)
Mr. Luigi Rovelli (Italy)
Mr. Lalchand K. Sheri (Singapore)
Rapporteur-General: Mr. Walter de Sa’Leitao (Brazil)
8. The Conference established a Main Committee, a Drafting Committee and a Credentials Committee.
Chairman: Mr. K.J. Gombrii (Norway)
Chairman: Mr. Malcolm J. Williams, Jr. (United States of America)
Core members: Algeria, Argentina, Belgium, China, Côte d’Ivoire,
Croatia, Denmark, Egypt, France, Gambia, Germany, Ghana,
Lithuania, Mexico, Russian Federation, Spain, Sri Lanka,
Tunisia, Turkey, United Kingdom of Great Britain and
Northern Ireland, and United States of America.
Chairman: Ms. Sama Payman (Australia)
Members: Australia, Benin, Brazil, China, Haiti, Mozambique,
Philippines, Russian Federation, United States of
9. The secretariat of the Conference included the following officers:
Secretary-General of UNCTAD, Mr. Rubens Ricupero; Executive Secretary,
Mr. Jean Gurunlian, Director, Division for Services Infrastructure for
Development and Trade Efficiency, UNCTAD; Deputy Executive Secretary,
Mrs. Rosalie Balkin, Director, Legal Affairs and External Relations Division,
IMO; Mrs. Monica N. Mbanefo, Senior Deputy Director, IMO; Mr. Agustín Blanco-
Bazán, Senior Legal Officer, IMO; Ms. Mahin Faghfouri, Head, Legal Unit, SITE,
UNCTAD; Mr. Carlos Moreno, Legal Officer, SITE, UNCTAD; Mr. Erik Chrispeels,
Senior Legal Officer, UNCTAD; Mr. Awni Behnam, Secretary of the Conference,
UNCTAD; Mr. Karma Tenzing, Deputy Secretary of the Conference, UNCTAD.
10. The Conference had before it, as a basis for its work, the draft articles
for a convention on arrest of ships1, prepared by the Joint UNCTAD/IMO
Intergovernmental Group of Experts on Maritime Liens and Mortgages and Related
Subjects, and the compilation of comments and proposals by Governments, and by
intergovernmental and non-governmental organizations, on the draft convention on
arrest of ships2. The Conference adopted its rules of procedure3 and its agenda.4
11. On the basis of its deliberations as recorded in its report,5 the Conference established the text of the
INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON ARREST OF SHIPS, 1999.
12. The text of the Convention was adopted by the Conference on 12 March 1999.
The Convention will be open for signature at United Nations Headquarters,
New York, from 1 September 1999 to and including 31 August 2000.
Done in Geneva, on this twelfth day of March, one thousand nine hundred and
ninety-nine, in one original in the Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian and
Spanish languages, all texts being equally authentic. The original of the Final
Act shall be deposited in the archives of the United Nations Secretariat.
President of the Conference
Secretary-General of UNCTAD
Executive Secretary of the Conference
Deputy Executive Secretary of the Conference
Head, Legal Unit, SITE
Senior Legal Officer
Secretary of the Conference
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the undersigned representatives have signed this Final Act.
The States whose representatives signed the Final Act are: Algeria,
Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Benin, Brazil, Cameroon, Canada, China, Colombia,
Côte d'Ivoire, Croatia, Cuba, Denmark, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Estonia,
Finland, France, Gabon, Gambia, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Guinea, Haiti, Honduras,
Indonesia, Iran (Islamic Republic of), Italy, Japan, Latvia, Liberia, Lithuania,
Madagascar, Malta, Marshall Islands, Mexico, Monaco, Mozambique, Netherlands,
Nigeria, Norway, Pakistan, Panama, Peru, Philippines, Portugal, Republic of
Korea, Romania, Russian Federation, Singapore, Slovenia, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sudan,
Syrian Arab Republic, Sweden, Switzerland, Thailand, Tunisia, Turkey, Ukraine,
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United Republic of
Tanzania, United States of America, and Viet Nam.
INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON ARREST OF SHIPS, 1999
The States Parties to this Convention,
Recognizing the desirability of facilitating the harmonious and orderly
development of world seaborne trade,
Convinced of the necessity for a legal instrument establishing
international uniformity in the field of arrest of ships which takes account of
recent developments in related fields,
Have agreed as follows:
For the purposes of this Convention:
1. "Maritime Claim" means a claim arising out of one or more of the following:
(a) loss or damage caused by the operation of the ship;
(b) loss of life or personal injury occurring, whether on land or on
water, in direct connection with the operation of the ship;
(c) salvage operations or any salvage agreement, including, if
applicable, special compensation relating to salvage operations in
respect of a ship which by itself or its cargo threatened damage to
(d) damage or threat of damage caused by the ship to the environment,
coastline or related interests; measures taken to prevent, minimize,
or remove such damage; compensation for such damage; costs of
reasonable measures of reinstatement of the environment actually
undertaken or to be undertaken; loss incurred or likely to be
incurred by third parties in connection with such damage; and
damage, costs, or loss of a similar nature to those identified in
this subparagraph (d);
(e) costs or expenses relating to the raising, removal, recovery,
destruction or the rendering harmless of a ship which is sunk,
wrecked, stranded or abandoned, including anything that is or has
been on board such ship, and costs or expenses relating to the
preservation of an abandoned ship and maintenance of its crew;
(f) any agreement relating to the use or hire of the ship, whether
contained in a charter party or otherwise;
(g) any agreement relating to the carriage of goods or passengers on
board the ship, whether contained in a charter party or otherwise;
(h) loss of or damage to or in connection with goods (including luggage)
carried on board the ship;
(i) general average;
(l) goods, materials, provisions, bunkers, equipment (including
containers) supplied or services rendered to the ship for its
operation, management, preservation or maintenance;
(m) construction, reconstruction, repair, converting or equipping of the
(n) port, canal, dock, harbour and other waterway dues and charges;
(o) wages and other sums due to the master, officers and other members
of the ship's complement in respect of their employment on the ship,
including costs of repatriation and social insurance contributions
payable on their behalf;
(p) disbursements incurred on behalf of the ship or its owners;
(q) insurance premiums (including mutual insurance calls) in respect of
the ship, payable by or on behalf of the shipowner or demise
(r) any commissions, brokerages or agency fees payable in respect of the
ship by or on behalf of the shipowner or demise charterer;
(s) any dispute as to ownership or possession of the ship;
(t) any dispute between co-owners of the ship as to the employment or
earnings of the ship;
(u) a mortgage or a "hypothèque" or a charge of the same nature on the
(v) any dispute arising out of a contract for the sale of the ship.
2. "Arrest" means any detention or restriction on removal of a ship by order
of a Court to secure a maritime claim, but does not include the seizure of a ship
in execution or satisfaction of a judgment or other enforceable instrument.
3. "Person" means any individual or partnership or any public or private body,
whether corporate or not, including a State or any of its constituent
4. "Claimant" means any person asserting a maritime claim.
5. "Court" means any competent judicial authority of a State.
Powers of arrest
1. A ship may be arrested or released from arrest only under the authority of
a Court of the State Party in which the arrest is effected.
2. A ship may only be arrested in respect of a maritime claim but in respect
of no other claim.
3. A ship may be arrested for the purpose of obtaining security
notwithstanding that, by virtue of a jurisdiction clause or arbitration clause
in any relevant contract, or otherwise, the maritime claim in respect of which
the arrest is effected is to be adjudicated in a State other than the State where
the arrest is effected, or is to be arbitrated, or is to be adjudicated subject
to the law of another State.
4. Subject to the provisions of this Convention, the procedure relating to the
arrest of a ship or its release shall be governed by the law of the State in
which the arrest was effected or applied for.
Exercise of right of arrest
1. Arrest is permissible of any ship in respect of which a maritime claim is
(a) the person who owned the ship at the time when the maritime claim
arose is liable for the claim and is owner of the ship when the
arrest is effected; or
(b) the demise charterer of the ship at the time when the maritime claim
arose is liable for the claim and is demise charterer or owner of
the ship when the arrest is effected; or
(c) the claim is based upon a mortgage or a "hypothèque" or a charge of
the same nature on the ship; or
(d) the claim relates to the ownership or possession of the ship; or
(e) the claim is against the owner, demise charterer, manager or
operator of the ship and is secured by a maritime lien which is
granted or arises under the law of the State where the arrest is
2. Arrest is also permissible of any other ship or ships which, when the
arrest is effected, is or are owned by the person who is liable for the maritime
claim and who was, when the claim arose:
(a) owner of the ship in respect of which the maritime claim arose; or
(b) demise charterer, time charterer or voyage charterer of that ship.
This provision does not apply to claims in respect of ownership or possession of
3. Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraphs 1 and 2 of this article, the
arrest of a ship which is not owned by the person liable for the claim shall be
permissible only if, under the law of the State where the arrest is applied for,
a judgment in respect of that claim can be enforced against that ship by judicial
or forced sale of that ship.
Release from arrest
1. A ship which has been arrested shall be released when sufficient security
has been provided in a satisfactory form, save in cases in which a ship has been
arrested in respect of any of the maritime claims enumerated in article 1,
paragraphs 1 (s) and (t). In such cases, the Court may permit the person in
possession of the ship to continue trading the ship, upon such person providing
sufficient security, or may otherwise deal with the operation of the ship during
the period of the arrest.
2. In the absence of agreement between the parties as to the sufficiency and
form of the security, the Court shall determine its nature and the amount
thereof, not exceeding the value of the arrested ship.
3. Any request for the ship to be released upon security being provided shall
not be construed as an acknowledgement of liability nor as a waiver of any
defence or any right to limit liability.
4. If a ship has been arrested in a non-party State and is not released
although security in respect of that ship has been provided in a State Party in
respect of the same claim, that security shall be ordered to be released on
application to the Court in the State Party.
5. If in a non-party State the ship is released upon satisfactory security in
respect of that ship being provided, any security provided in a State Party in
respect of the same claim shall be ordered to be released to the extent that the
total amount of security provided in the two States exceeds:
(a) the claim for which the ship has been arrested, or
(b) the value of the ship,
whichever is the lower. Such release shall, however, not be ordered unless the
security provided in the non-party State will actually be available to the
claimant and will be freely transferable.
6. Where, pursuant to paragraph 1 of this article, security has been provided,
the person providing such security may at any time apply to the Court to have
that security reduced, modified, or cancelled.
Right of rearrest and multiple arrest
1. Where in any State a ship has already been arrested and released or
security in respect of that ship has already been provided to secure a maritime
claim, that ship shall not thereafter be rearrested or arrested in respect of the
same maritime claim unless:
(a) the nature or amount of the security in respect of that ship already
provided in respect of the same claim is inadequate, on condition
that the aggregate amount of security may not exceed the value of
the ship; or
(b) the person who has already provided the security is not, or is
unlikely to be, able to fulfil some or all of that person’s
(c) the ship arrested or the security previously provided was released
(i) upon the application or with the consent of the claimant
acting on reasonable grounds, or
(ii) because the claimant could not by taking reasonable steps
prevent the release.
2. Any other ship which would otherwise be subject to arrest in respect of the
same maritime claim shall not be arrested unless:
(a) the nature or amount of the security already provided in respect of
the same claim is inadequate; or
(b) the provisions of paragraph 1 (b) or (c) of this article are
3. "Release" for the purpose of this article shall not include any unlawful
release or escape from arrest.
Protection of owners and demise charterers of arrested ships
1. The Court may as a condition of the arrest of a ship, or of permitting an
arrest already effected to be maintained, impose upon the claimant who seeks to
arrest or who has procured the arrest of the ship the obligation to provide
security of a kind and for an amount, and upon such terms, as may be determined
by that Court for any loss which may be incurred by the defendant as a result of
the arrest, and for which the claimant may be found liable, including but not
restricted to such loss or damage as may be incurred by that defendant in
(a) the arrest having been wrongful or unjustified; or
(b) excessive security having been demanded and provided.
2. The Courts of the State in which an arrest has been effected shall have
jurisdiction to determine the extent of the liability, if any, of the claimant
for loss or damage caused by the arrest of a ship, including but not restricted
to such loss or damage as may be caused in consequence of:
(a) the arrest having been wrongful or unjustified, or
(b) excessive security having been demanded and provided.
3. The liability, if any, of the claimant in accordance with paragraph 2 of
this article shall be determined by application of the law of the State where the
arrest was effected.
4. If a Court in another State or an arbitral tribunal is to determine the
merits of the case in accordance with the provisions of article 7, then
proceedings relating to the liability of the claimant in accordance with
paragraph 2 of this article may be stayed pending that decision.
5. Where pursuant to paragraph 1 of this article security has been provided,
the person providing such security may at any time apply to the Court to have
that security reduced, modified or cancelled.
Jurisdiction on the merits of the case
1. The Courts of the State in which an arrest has been effected or security
provided to obtain the release of the ship shall have jurisdiction to determine
the case upon its merits, unless the parties validly agree or have validly agreed
to submit the dispute to a Court of another State which accepts jurisdiction, or
2. Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph 1 of this article, the Courts
of the State in which an arrest has been effected, or security provided to obtain
the release of the ship, may refuse to exercise that jurisdiction where that
refusal is permitted by the law of that State and a Court of another State
3. In cases where a Court of the State where an arrest has been effected or
security provided to obtain the release of the ship:
(a) does not have jurisdiction to determine the case upon its merits; or
(b) has refused to exercise jurisdiction in accordance with the
provisions of paragraph 2 of this article,
such Court may, and upon request shall, order a period of time within which the
claimant shall bring proceedings before a competent Court or arbitral tribunal.
4. If proceedings are not brought within the period of time ordered in
accordance with paragraph 3 of this article then the ship arrested or the
security provided shall, upon request, be ordered to be released.
5. If proceedings are brought within the period of time ordered in accordance
with paragraph 3 of this article, or if proceedings before a competent Court or
arbitral tribunal in another State are brought in the absence of such order, any
final decision resulting therefrom shall be recognized and given effect with
respect to the arrested ship or to the security provided in order to obtain its
release, on condition that:
(a) the defendant has been given reasonable notice of such proceedings
and a reasonable opportunity to present the case for the defence;
(b) such recognition is not against public policy (ordre public).
6. Nothing contained in the provisions of paragraph 5 of this article shall
restrict any further effect given to a foreign judgment or arbitral award under
the law of the State where the arrest of the ship was effected or security
provided to obtain its release.
1. This Convention shall apply to any ship within the jurisdiction of any
State Party, whether or not that ship is flying the flag of a State Party.
2. This Convention shall not apply to any warship, naval auxiliary or other
ships owned or operated by a State and used, for the time being, only on
government non-commercial service.
3. This Convention does not affect any rights or powers vested in any
Government or its departments, or in any public authority, or in any dock or
harbour authority, under any international convention or under any domestic law
or regulation, to detain or otherwise prevent from sailing any ship within their
4. This Convention shall not affect the power of any State or Court to make
orders affecting the totality of a debtor's assets.
5. Nothing in this Convention shall affect the application of international
conventions providing for limitation of liability, or domestic law giving effect
thereto, in the State where an arrest is effected.
6. Nothing in this Convention shall modify or affect the rules of law in force
in the States Parties relating to the arrest of any ship physically within the
jurisdiction of the State of its flag procured by a person whose habitual
residence or principal place of business is in that State, or by any other person
who has acquired a claim from such person by subrogation, assignment or
Non-creation of maritime liens
Nothing in this Convention shall be construed as creating a maritime lien.
1. Any State may, at the time of signature, ratification, acceptance,
approval, or accession, or at any time thereafter, reserve the right to exclude
the application of this Convention to any or all of the following :
(a) ships which are not seagoing;
(b) ships not flying the flag of a State Party;
(c) claims under article 1, paragraph 1 (s).
2. A State may, when it is also a State Party to a specified treaty on
navigation on inland waterways, declare when signing, ratifying, accepting,
approving or acceding to this Convention, that rules on jurisdiction, recognition
and execution of court decisions provided for in such treaties shall prevail over
the rules contained in article 7 of this Convention.
This Convention shall be deposited with the Secretary-General of the
Signature, ratification, acceptance, approval and accession
1. This Convention shall be open for signature by any State at the
Headquarters of the United Nations, New York, from 1 September 1999 to
31 August 2000 and shall thereafter remain open for accession.
2. States may express their consent to be bound by this Convention by:
(a) signature without reservation as to ratification, acceptance or
(b) signature subject to ratification, acceptance or approval, followed
by ratification, acceptance or approval; or
3. Ratification, acceptance, approval or accession shall be effected by the
deposit of an instrument to that effect with the depositary.
States with more than one system of law
1. If a State has two or more territorial units in which different systems of
law are applicable in relation to matters dealt with in this Convention, it may
at the time of signature, ratification, acceptance, approval or accession declare
that this Convention shall extend to all its territorial units or only to one or
more of them and may modify this declaration by submitting another declaration
at any time.
2. Any such declaration shall be notified to the depositary and shall state
expressly the territorial units to which the Convention applies.
3. In relation to a State Party which has two or more systems of law with
regard to arrest of ships applicable in different territorial units, references
in this Convention to the Court of a State and the law of a State shall be
respectively construed as referring to the Court of the relevant territorial unit
within that State and the law of the relevant territorial unit of that State.
Entry into force
1. This Convention shall enter into force six months following the date on
which 10 States have expressed their consent to be bound by it.
2. For a State which expresses its consent to be bound by this Convention
after the conditions for entry into force thereof have been met, such consent
shall take effect three months after the date of expression of such consent.
Revision and amendment
1. A conference of States Parties for the purpose of revising or amending this
Convention shall be convened by the Secretary-General of the United Nations at
the request of one-third of the States Parties.
2. Any consent to be bound by this Convention, expressed after the date of
entry into force of an amendment to this Convention, shall be deemed to apply to
the Convention, as amended.
1. This Convention may be denounced by any State Party at any time after the
date on which this Convention enters into force for that State.
2. Denunciation shall be effected by deposit of an instrument of denunciation
with the depositary.
3. A denunciation shall take effect one year, or such longer period as may be
specified in the instrument of denunciation, after the receipt of the instrument
of denunciation by the depositary.
This Convention is established in a single original in the Arabic, Chinese,
English, French, Russian and Spanish languages, each text being equally
DONE AT Geneva this twelfth day of March, one thousand nine hundred and
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the undersigned being duly authorized by their
respective Governments for that purpose have signed this Convention.
You may also be interested in:
Qatar and the restrictions imposed upon it (note - we do not use the word 'sanctions'!) by several members of the Arab League have caused a lot of distress at the UK P&I and Defence Club in the past few weeks. It turns out that a key difficulty was distinguishing between the wording of the restrictions themselves and how they were actually implemented in practice.
The International Group of P&I Clubs, International Chamber of Shipping (ICS), BIMCO and InterManager (the “international industry organisations”) draw Members’ attention to the series of recent ship detentions and crew arrests in Mexico and, in the case of the UBC Savannah, the lengthy and continuing detention in custody of the ship’s Master without any formal