Armed guards - 21 July 2011
Despite recent media suggestions, there is no formal white list of 'approved' marine security companies maintained by UK Club.
However, there are numerous contracts between our Members and such companies that have been approved, in many cases after amendments suggested by us. Approval of a contract does not mean that we have vetted or approved the company in a wider sense - we haven't.
The latest edition ofHiLights
published this week includes an explanation of how the Club can assist Members entering into such contracts.
Most states and industry associations, including the International Group clubs, remain firmly opposed to the arming of crew and on-board security personnel.
There are risks inherent in the use of arms by untrained or improperly trained persons including an enhanced risk of loss of life or injury, escalation of armed engagement and the use of more potent and warlike weaponry.
A variety of Flag state and port state restrictions, licensing requirements or prohibitions relate to arms on board ships as recently referred to in theSouth African Review
and ourloss prevention bulletin 744
P&I cover does not restrict or prohibit per se the deployment of on-board security personnel. But, proper care and diligence should be exercised in relation to the selection of the appointed security company.
More information on good practice in respect of armed guards arrangements, as well as the risks and impact on P&I cover can be found in this latest HiLights which can be downloaded as apdf
You may also be interested in:
Amid the continuing migrant crisis in the Mediterranean and the media attention this story continues to receive, it is often easy to forget that the problem of stowaways is still a very real risk for shipowners. The UK Club has recently handled several concurrent cases, with a similar modus operandi, concerning stowaways from West Africa boarding ballasted ships bound for South America, Brazil in particular. Amanda Hastings discusses.
From 1 January 2020, the new 0.5% m/m global limit for sulphur in fuel used on board ships comes into effect. Parties in the bunker chain i.e. those involved in the production, distribution, storage, handling and use of bunker fuels have expressed concerns over the practical implementation of this new global limit, a substantial drop from the current 3.5% m/m. A Joint Industry Project (JIP) was therefore established to raise awareness of the issues which might arise.
Following up from the 1st webinar. Anuj and Ansuman were joined this time by James Duncombe from CWA to answer the various queries raised by the audience.