QCR Spring 2021: Lopez v. Catalina Channel Express, Inc. - US Ninth Circuit Requires Availability of Alternative Methods for Restroom Accommodations under the Americans with Disabilities Act

FACTS

On September 9, 2020, The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuits (which includes California, Oregon and Washington) issued its opinion on the Lopez v. Catalina Channel Express, No.19-55136 (9th Cir., 2020).  The crux of the issue in this case was that the restroom on the Jet Cat Express, a passenger vessel owned and operated by Catalina, was too narrow for Plaintiff’s wheelchair and he unfortunately soiled himself. Catalina had not altered the restroom since 2001. However, they are argued that widening the restroom was not readily achievable. The Central District Court of California granted Summary Judgment in favour of defendant, Catalina Channel Express, against Plaintiff’s Title III American with Disabilities Act lawsuit and Plaintiff appealed.

JUDGEMENT

The Ninth Circuit agreed that plaintiff failed to meet the burden of proving that widening the restroom doorway was readily achievable. This followed the Second Circuit’s (which includes New York State) burden-shifting framework.  However, the Ninth Circuit went on to say that Plaintiff could still prevail on a Title III discrimination claim if he establishes that Catalina “chose not to make the restroom available to him even though it could have through alternative methods without much difficulty or expense.” On that basis, the Ninth Circuit remanded to the District Court to determine whether Catalina made the restroom available through “alternative methods.”

COMMENTS

This case illustrates that even if an accommodation under the ADA is not readily achievable for structural or other legitimate reasons, owners and operators, especially on passenger vessels, must make sure that the activity in question can be made available to protected individuals through alternative methods. However, the level of difficulty and the expense of the alternative methods are also taken into consideration when analysing the risks of a potential Title III discrimination claim.

Further information can be found at the links below.

For more information please view the case and the statute at issue. 

Staff Author

UK P&I

Date01/04/2021

Tags

You may also be interested in:

Videos

The UK P&I Club recently held the 16th in our series of Live Webinars, this time in collaboration with the Mission to Seafarers which focussed on Crew Health matters and in particular mental wellbeing.

Articles

Members are advised that effective 12:00pm, Thursday 22 July, South Australia transitioned from a 'low risk' state to a ‘medium risk’ state, advance warning of a FIC has also been given which will run in Australia from 1 August to 31 September 2021 to determine the level of compliance with the safety of navigation requirements of International Conventions and familiarity of the masters and officers with their processes for ensuring safety of navigation.

Articles

In 1914, a single ship passed through the Panama Canal to little fanefare bringing to fruition a multinational effort that began 44 years prior, this article looks at the brief history of the canal and some claims considerations.

Articles

This article examines the outlook for offshore wind farms in the United States, including the two types of offshore wind farm, regulatory compliance and more.