QCR Winter 2020: K Line Pte Ltd v Priminds Shipping (HK) Co Ltd (The “Eternal Bliss”) [2020] EWHC 2373 (Comm)

Are damages claimable in addition to demurrage following a delay in discharging?  Is a separate breach required?

K Line Pte Ltd v Priminds Shipping (HK) Co Ltd (The “Eternal Bliss”) [2020] EWHC 2373 (Comm)

The “Eternal Bliss” case arose from the carriage of a cargo of soybeans from Brazil to China under a voyage charterparty. There was a 31 day delay in discharging as a result of congestion, and a lack of storage space for the cargo. Upon inspection after discharge, the owner faced a cargo claim from the receivers in respect of alleged damage to the cargo. The owner settled the claim for in excess of US$1m, and then claimed this cost from the charterer. The breach that the owner alleged against the charterer was the failure to discharge the cargo within the laytime allowed under the charter. Consequently, the charterer said that the claim should be dismissed, on the basis that the demurrage regime provided an agreed, fixed monetary remedy for breach of this obligation. The question of law raised by the rival arguments was referred, on assumed facts, to the High Court in London.

For the full summary of this case, Members are directed to the UK Defence Club’s Soundings dated October 2020.

UK Club Staff

UK P&I

Date30/12/2020

Tags

You may also be interested in:

Articles

The UK Club’s local correspondent has informed the Club of China’s revised maritime traffic safety law, which will come into effect on September 1st 2021.

Correspondents

The UK Club has recently been made aware of new measures put in place at Chinese ports in an effort to slow the spread of Covid-19, in particular the Indian variant.

Quarterly Case Review

Whether Master, ​presented by Shippers with clean BL to sign, was provided with warranty that cargo shipped in good order and condition – Consideration of Article III rules 3 and 5 of the Hague Rules.

Articles

The purpose of the ICA is to avoid lengthy and costly litigation on matters of liability and apportionment, and instead seeks to provide a ‘rough and ready’ split of liability between the parties.  The Clubs recommend to their Members that they adopt the Agreement for the purpose of apportioning liability for claims in respect of cargo which arise under, out of or in connection with all charterparties on the NYPE Form 1946 or Asbatime Form 1981, whether or not this Agreement has been incorporated into such charterparties.  However, unless the ICA is specifically incorporated into the charterparty, it may not be enforceable.