Maritime Labour Convention update 15/05/2013
Recent press articles and the imminent entry into force of the Maritime Labour Convention have brought the Convention and its requirements on shipowners into focus and in particular the financial security requirements established in the convention. By way of clarification and for owners guidance the financial security requirements which will become effective in August 2013 are set out below.Standard A2.5 – Repatriation
This Standard and accompanying Guidelines provide that seafarers are repatriated at no cost to themselves and shipowners shall provide financial security for the liabilities contained in the Standard. Owners liability for this Standard has been discussed extensively. All clubs considered the provisions on repatriation in case of insolvency which were set out in the Board Agenda Note circulated in August last year. Club boards subsequently agreed that they would provide repatriation cover for insolvency risks on a non-poolable basis.
This Standard does not include a provision on outstanding unpaid wages following abandonment. Liability for unpaid wages following abandonment is a feature of the principles agreed in the International Labour Organisation (ILO) in 2009. These principles are not applicable at this stage and there is no requirement in the MLC 2006 to provide financial security by way of insurance cover for unpaid wages. The ILO principles are subject to further discussion and negotiation and to take this forward ILO has scheduled a meeting for April 2014. It will then take several years for the principles to be considered in ILO, finalised and implemented in MLC Member States. The current position, however, is that unpaid wages are not covered by the MLC and there is no requirement to provide financial security for such unpaid wages.Regulation 4.2 – Shipowners’ Liability (for sickness, injury or death)
This financial security requirement is limited to incidents that are broadly already covered by the Clubs in respect of death or long term disability of seafarers. To clarify the cover that clubs have had in place for some time, in 2009 clubs adopted a policy decision to waive the pay to be paid and retrospective withdrawal of cover rules for valid seafarer death and personal injury claims and with the introduction of that policy decision and the rule changes introduced at the commencement of the 2013 policy year club cover is MLC compliant.Standard 1.4 Recruitment and Placement
There has been some misunderstanding as to the requirements on owners and insurers as regards recruitment. The MLC does not introduce a requirement on owners to provide financial security in respect of the recruitment of seafarers. The MLC imposes duties and obligations on States Parties to the convention and agencies involved in recruitment and placement services may be subject to specific licencing requirements, but this is a matter for each State Party to consider when implementing the Convention.Standard 2.2 Wages
It has been suggested that that the MLC introduces an obligation on owners to maintain financial security for unpaid wages. As noted above in the context of insolvency this is incorrect. The MLC does not introduce a requirement on owners to provide financial security for the payment of wages. It does, however, introduce obligations on States Parties and in turn States will require owners to ensure seafarers are paid. This does not require owners to meet their obligation to pay wages through the provision of financial security.Other matters
The Group has contacted each of the 38 States Parties to ask whether their administrations will accept a Certificate of Entry as evidence of the owners financial security (in respect of Standards 2.5 and 4.2). To date such confirmation has been received from Bahamas, Cayman Islands, Cyprus, Kiribati, Liberia, St Kitts & Nevis, Marshall Islands, Malta, Switzerland Tuvalu and the UK. Some States have not yet developed their implementing legislation and others have not yet considered the issue. Engagement with the remaining States on his issue is continuing. To date no State has said they will refuse a Certificate of Entry.Attached Circulars
Attached at the top of this page is a circular on the MLC issued by the Government of Cyprus (paragraph 8 on page 8 confirms acceptance of a Certificate of Entry) and one from the United States which gives notice that in order to assist U.S. vessels in avoiding Port State Control actions in ports of States that have ratified the MLC, the U.S Coast Guard plans to implement a voluntary compliance inspection program and issue Statements of Voluntary Compliance.
Maritime Labour Convention 2006 – Ratification and Early Implementation by Cyprus. Maritime Labour Convention 2006 – Ratification and Early Implementation by Cyprus. (401 KB)
February 5, 2013. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES National Institutes of Health Vol. 78, No. 28/Monday, February 11, 2013/Notices Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health; Notice of Closed Meeting (124 KB)
You may also be interested in:
In the case of Addax Energy SA v MV Yasa H.
Hold Cleaning: the legal issues
The preparation of cargo holds for the next intended carriage is a critical operation which requires careful planning and execution; this article considers a number of legal issues which may arise, including terms commonly used in charterparties to describe the cleanliness of cargo holds, the consequences of failing to comply with such terms, potentially resulting in off-hire claims and damages, and the role of the independent surveyor.