China - Time Bars
TIME BAR - IN GENERAL
The General Provisions of the Civil Law of the People's Republic of China (the "General Provisions") (which came into force on 1 October 2017) provides that a general 3-year time bar is applicable for civil claims (Art. 188).
This is an extension of the shorter time limits under the General Principles of the Civil Law of the People's Republic of China (the "General Principles"). Under the General Principles (which remains effective), a general 2-year time bar is applicable for civil claims (Art. 135) and a 1-year time bar is applicable to cases involving the following (Art. 136):
- Personal Injury
- Sales of substandard products without proper notice
- Delays in paying rent or refusal to pay rent
- Loss of or damage to belongings left in the custody of another person
To provide guidance on the interplay between the General Provisions and the General Principles, on 2 July 2018, the Supreme People's Court issued the Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Limitation of Action Provided in the General Provisions of Civil Law of the People's Republic of China (the "Interpretation"). According to the Interpretation:
- If the limitation period only starts running after the effective date of the General Provisions (1 October 2017), the limitation period under Art. 188 of the General Provisions shall apply, i.e. 3 years for general claims.
- If the 2-year or 1-year time bar under the General Principles has not expired on the effective date of the General Provisions (1 October 2017), the limitation period under the General Provisions shall apply, i.e. 3 years for general claims.
- If the 2-year or 1-year time bar under the General Principles had already expired before the effective date of the General Provisions (1 October 2017), the limitation period of 3 years under the General Provisions shall not apply and the 2-year or 1-year time bar under the General Principles will continue to apply.
The Interpretation applies to cases which are heard at first-instance or second-instance as at the effective date of the Interpretation (23 July 2018) and does not apply to cases that have been concluded prior to the said date, where parties have applied for retrial, or cases which are to be re-tried according to trial supervision procedures.GENERAL RULES – COMPARISON BETWEEN THE GENERAL PRINCIPLES AND THE GENERAL PROVISIONSA. Commencement of limitation period
|Commencement dates of limitation period||From the day on which the claimant knows or ought to know that his right is infringed (Art.137)|
From the day in which the claimant knows or ought to know that his right is infringed and the identity of the obligor (Art 188)
|Commencement dates for specific causes of action||No|
e.g. where the parties have agreed on the payment of a debt by instalments, the limitation period shall be calculated from the day when the time limit for the last instalment expires (Art. 189)
|The People's Court should not support a claim which has exceeded 20 years from the date when the right is infringed (Art. 137)||The People's Court should not support a claim which has exceeded 20 years from the date when the right is infringed (Art. 188)|
|Circumstances under which a time bar may be interrupted|
A time bar may be interrupted if:
1. a law suit is brought;
2. one party makes a claim against the other party: or
3. one party agrees to fulfil his obligations
For maritime claims, a time bar can also be interrupted by arrest of ship.
A time bar may be interrupted if:
1. the oblige requests the obligor's performance;
2. the obligor agrees to perform his obligations;
3. the oblige institutes an action or applies for arbitration: or
4. any other circumstances that have the same effect as the filing of a lawsuit or applying for arbitration
|Recalculation of time bar||Upon the occurrence of one of the above events (Art. 140)||From the time of interruption or conclusion of the relevant procedure (Art. 195)|
|Grounds for suspension of time bar||During the last 6 months of the limitation period, the time bar can be suspended on the grounds that a force majeure or other obstacles prevent the claimant from exercising his right (Art. 139)|
During the last 6 months of the limitation period, the time bar can be suspended if a claim cannot be filed due to any of the following obstacles:
1. a force majeure;
2. the person without or with limited capacity for civil conduct has no statutory agent, or his or her statutory agent dies, loses capacity for civil conduct, or loses the power conferred by laws;
3. the successor or legacy administrator has not been determined after the commencement of succession;
4. the obligee is controlled by the obligor or any other person; or
5. any other obstacle resulting in the obligee's failure to file a claim.
|Resumption of time bar|
Grounds for the suspension are eliminated (Art. 139)
If the cause(s) for suspension has/have not been eliminated by the effective date of the General Provisions (1 October 2017), the provisions on suspension of the General Provisions shall apply. (Art. 4 of the Interpretation)
|Limitation period shall expire 6 months after the day when the obstacle causing the suspension is eliminated (Art. 194)|
|Whether time bar can be amended by agreement||No express provision|
Any agreement between the parties in respect of the period, calculation method and causes of suspension or interruption of time bar shall be void (Art. 197)
As the general time bars under the General Principles and General Provisions apply unless as otherwise prescribed by any law, specific time bars which apply for certain types of claims under other civil laws remain valid. Examples of specific time bars are summarised in the following table.
|Defective products (Art. 45, Product Quality Law)||2 years|
|Environmental damage (Art. 66, Environment Protection Law)||3 years|
|Contracts on international sale of goods (Art. 129, Contract Law)||4 years|
|Contracts on technology import and export (Art. 129, Contract Law)||4 years|
For maritime claims, the Chinese Maritime Code (CMC) and other relevant legislation set up specific time bars with regard to different types of claims. These time bars are summarised in the following table.
|Claims under bills of lading/sea carriage contracts* (Art. 257, CMC)||1 year||the day on which the goods are delivered or should have been delivered by the carrier|
|Carrier’s claim against the shipper in relation to carriage of goods by sea** (Judicial Interpretation (Fashi  No.3))||1 year||the day on which the carrier knows or ought to know that his rights have been infringed|
|Recourse actions under bills of lading/sea carriage contract (Art. 257, CMC)||90 days||the day on which the person claiming for the recourse settles the claim or the day a copy of a court’s acceptance of the claim against that person is served|
|Claims regarding sea towage (Art.260, CMC)||1 year||the day on which the carrier knows or ought to know that his rights have been infringed|
|Claims regarding general average (Art.263, CMC)||1 year||the day on which the adjustment was finished|
|Carriage of passengers by sea (Art. 258, CMC)||2 years (3 years)|
Personal injury/damage to luggage - the day on which the passenger disembarks or should have disembarked;
Death of passenger - the day on which the passenger should have disembarked; if the death of passengers occurs after the disembarkation but is a result from an injury during the period of carriage by sea, counting from the day of the death of the passenger concerned, provided that this period does not exceed 3 years from the time of disembarkation
|Collision between ships (Art. 261, CMC)||2 years||the day on which the collision occurs|
|Recourse claims for third party liability arising from both-to-blame collisions (Art. 261, CMC)||1 year||the day on which the parties concerned jointly and severally pay the amount of compensation for the damage occurred|
|Salvage (Art. 262, CMC)||2 years||the day on which the salvage operation is completed|
Marine insurance (Art. 264, CMC)
|2 years||the day on which the peril insured against occurred|
|Charter party disputes (Art. 257, 259, CMC)||2 years||from the date when the claimant knows or ought to know that their rights have been infringed|
|Oil pollution damage (Art. 265, CMC)||3 years (6 years)||the day on which the pollution damage occurs (in no circumstances should exceed 6 years from the date of the pollution accident)|
|Claims against the China Oil Pollution Compensation Fund (Art.22, Administrative Measures on the Collection and Use of Compensation Funds for Vessel-Induced Oil Pollution Damage)||3 years (6 years)||the date when the pollution damage occurs (in no circumstances should exceed 6 years from the date of the pollution accident)|
|Maritime liens (Art. 29, CMC)***||1 year||the day on which the maritime lien incurs|
* For the purpose of time bar, a charter party is not regarded as a sea carriage contract. A different time bar applies to charter party disputes.
** Carrier's claims against the shipper also include carrier's claims for container demurrage. The time bar starts counting from the day after the free-time expiration date.
*** The limitation period for enforcing a maritime lien cannot be interrupted or suspended as a normal time bar.
You may also be interested in:
In 1914, a single ship passed through the Panama Canal to little fanefare bringing to fruition a multinational effort that began 44 years prior, this article looks at the brief history of the canal and some claims considerations.
In the second episode of the UK Club ask an expert series focusing on ballast water the topic of Type Approval US Vs IMO, old G8 Vs BWM Code – Limitations of the Type Approval is examined with Dr Li Gang from SGS.
Our Americas Members often deal with contracts of carriage subject to the US Carriage of Goods by Sea Act (“COGSA”) and the Harter Act, this article addresses some frequently asked questions.