Lessons Learnt: Flooding of cargo hold
During cargo operations, the duty deck officer noticed the presence of a large quantity of water within one of the holds. He immediately informed the master and arrangements were made to transfer the water into a holding tank using the hold bilge pumping system. The depth of water was measured to be almost 6 metres and approximately 30 containers were fully or partially submerged. When the hold was pumped dry, the affected containers were discharged and jointly inspected at the Receivers premises where significant damage to the cargo was found due to sea water ingress through the container seals and vents. Investigation on board revealed that the flooding of the hold was caused by water ingress through corrosion fractures in the tank tops of two deep ballast tanks located at the port and starboard sides of the space.Analysis
It was reported that the ballast tanks in way of the holds were routinely not filled to capacity as a precautionary measure. However, on this particular voyage, the subject tanks were filled to 100% capacity allowing water to leak through the defective tank top plating. Due to the nature of container ship operations, it may be difficult for the crew to closely inspect and hydrostatically test hold boundaries on a frequent basis. However, every opportunity should be taken to do this as operations allow so that any deficiencies are reported and rectified to maintain the watertight integrity of the holds. Cargo hold tank top base fittings are also vulnerable to fracture when containers are landed heavily during loading. In this case the hold bilge high level alarms, which may have provided early warning of flooding, were also found to be out of order.Lessons Learnt
- Inspection and hydrostatic testing of cargo hold boundaries with ballast tanks should be incorporated into the vessel planned maintenance system
- The precautionary partial filling of tanks is not a substitute for the proper maintenance of tank tops and the resulting free surface may adversely affect stability
- Cargo hold bilges should be sounded on a daily basis as weather permits and high level alarms, if fitted, regularly tested to maintain function
- Containers are not designed for immersion in water and flooding incidents of this nature can result in very high value claims
You may also be interested in:
QCR Autumn 2021: Patil v. Amber Lagoon Shipping GMBH (unpublished) Grant of Summary Judgment in vessel's favor in LHWCA § 905(b): Suit brought by marine surveyor
The US Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court's findings that the evidence did not adequately support an allegation of breach by the Defendant vessel owners of their Scindia duties.
This article reviews the general concepts of the 905(b) claim and how past decisions helped bring into focus some key issues related to shore-side workers' claims against vessels.
QCR Winter 2021: M/V HONEY
Commercial diver working on a recreational vessel could not take advantage of LHWCA exception where plaintiffs failed to demonstrate State Workers' Compensation Cover