Lessons Learnt: Wet damage to cargo of maize
The full length video is also available at our Vimeo page.
While watching ask yourself, "Could this happen on my ship?"
The subject 5 hold vessel was fixed to load a full cargo of yellow Maize in bulk. The previous cargo was bulk fertiliser. On completion of loading, all holds were fumigated and the holds were then closed, secured and sealed.
During the initial stages of the voyage, the vessel encountered heavy weather, with spray and seas shipped on deck and all hatch covers over a period of 8 days.
Upon arrival at the discharge port, the hold and manhole seals were inspected and found to be intact. Hold no.'s 2, 3 and 5 were approved for discharge. However, hold no.'s 1 and 4 were rejected. A bad odour was reported at the forward end of both hatchways.
The surface of the cargo stow in both of the rejected cargo holds was found to be locally mouldy, discoloured and caked, with temperatures in the affected areas measured up to 63°C. The quantity of damaged cargo was estimated to be about 10 to 12 MT in each hold.
During the pre-discharge inspection of the cargo, examination of the hatch cover panel cross joints of hold no.'s 1 and 4 revealed that a substantial amount of wetted maize kernels and associated residue were present in the drain channels above and between the cross joint sealing. It was apparent that the panel cross joints had not been cleaned in preparation of the hatch covers being closed at the load port. The hatch coaming drain channels were also found to contain cargo residue, which had either not been removed after loading or had collected in the channels through water drainage from the cross joints.
Watch the video to see what lessons can be learnt from this experience.
For more information please get in touch with our Loss Prevention team who will be pleased to assist you.
You may also be interested in:
QCR Spring 2021: Argos Pereira España SL and another v Athenian Marine Ltd  EWHC 554 (Comm)
Equitable Compensation for Failure to Comply with Arbitration Clause; the Owners issued bills of lading (governed by English law) for the cargo which contained a law and jurisdiction clause providing that disputes arising under the bills of lading were to be determined in arbitration in London.