Incorporating charterparty terms into bills of lading: don't get caught out!
The views and opinions expressed here are solely those of the original author or contributor. These views and opinions do not necessarily represent those of the UK P&I Club.
The issue of incorporation of charterparties into bills of lading is debated by the English courts on a fairly frequent basis; most recently in the Anna Bo (2015) and the Magellan Spirit (2016). So what’s all the fuss about really and how do you avoid getting caught out?
As with many contracts, an omission of a term will not become apparent (or cause a problem) until something goes wrong – but when it does, it can be very difficult (and expensive) to rectify. This can be seen in the Magellan Spirit where owners sought to rely on exclusive jurisdiction clause in the charterparty (and amend the bill of lading), allowing them an anti-suit injunction against cargo interests in Nigeria. The court held that bill should not be rectified to incorporate the charterparty jurisdiction clause as there was no relevant continuing common intention capable of supporting a claim for rectification, and Owners were left fighting a US$15.4million claim in an unfriendly jurisdiction.
Conversely in the Anna Bo, it was cargo interests arguing against the incorporation of the charterparty. Also on a jurisdiction point, cargo interests tried to argue that the incorporation of the charterparty into the bill of lading was limited to freight. The court rejected this argument, holding that the charterparty was clearly incorporated
So how do you avoid being caught out?
Clearly identify the charterparty on the bill of lading. Rocket science this is not! Most standard short form bills provide a box where you can identify the charterparty by date – fill it out!
Choose your incorporation wording wisely. English law has a number of tests in place to protect the receiver from onerous and/or irrelevant charterparty clauses, so be aware that generally only the terms directly relevant to contract of carriage will be incorporated.
Conflicts beware. If there is a discrepancy between your charterparty terms and the bill of lading, then be aware that the clause paramount in the bill will likely override a similar clause in an associated charterparty.
For a more detailed review of incorporation of charterparty terms into bills of lading, please see the following
You may also be interested in:
There has been a change in ownership of the E-TITLE electronic trading system and its underlying legal framework to software technology firm, R3; There has been a change in trading name of the E-TITLE electronic trading system to Corda eBL; Members are invited to take note of how the Corda eBL software will operate.
Founded in 1543, Santos has been long known as a port city – first through the export of coffee and then other commodities. Santos was significantly modernised and expanded in the 1990s to incorporate new technologies, operating with specialised terminals for containers, general cargo, and dry and liquid bulk, and it is responsible for almost 27% of the country’s trade. Santos is considered the largest port in Latin America, with its docks being 25 km long and able to accommodate about 50 ships at a time.
With cargo’s newfound ability to go well beyond the vessel and even the port, container lines face new liabilities. The intermodal capability means that containers transit on public highways and railroads, areas traditionally excluded from P&I cover. This new type of risk has given rise to the Through Transport Club (‘TT Club’), a specialised transport and logistics mutual covering risks complementing P&I cover. Both covers dovetail with one another through corresponding cover and exclusions during ocean transit.
This circular confirms approval by the International Group of an updated version of the Secro Customer and User Agreement dated 16th March 2023 as well as use of the Secro Customer e-billls of lading in conjunction with the said User Agreement