Australia: can Charterers be required to provide security under s.27 of the updated Protection of the Sea Act?
Australian policy makers have a very low (zero) tolerance for pollution of the sea. This is reflected in the Commonwealth's Protection of the Sea (Prevention of Pollution from Ships) Act 1983 ("the Act") which (at Sections 9 and 10) sets out strict liability offences for oil and oily water pollution attracting maximum fines of AUD$3.4 million for individuals and AUD$17 million for corporations.
Section 27A of the Act also gives the Australian Maritime Safety Authority (AMSA) the power to detain a foreign ship if there are "clear grounds for believing that a pollution breach has occurred". AMSA have powers to investigate further under Section 27 and the right to demand security before releasing the vessel.
AMSA have recently demanded security in the sum of AUS$20.4 million for what may be a relatively minor alleged breach. AMSA has indicated that they must demand security in the maximum amount of all penalties that could be payable (i.e. AUS$17 million for the Owner plus AUS$3.4 million for the Master). This suggests that AMSA believe that they do not have discretion to request a lower amount of security for minor offences. This has far reaching ramifications for Owners and their Insurers.
It is noteworthy that while all of Owners, Master and Charterer are strictly liable for a pollution offence under sections 9 and 10 of the Act, Section 27A of the Act does not give AMSA the power to demand security for the potential fines of a Charterer. Due to this anomaly AMSA are restricted to AUS$20.4 million rather than AUS$37.4 million!
Until such time as the legislation is amended or there has been a successful judicial review of the demand for security under Section 27A(4)(b) of the Protection of the Sea (Prevention of Pollution from Ships) Act 1983, the risk of very high security demands by AMSA remains.
Owners and operators should bear this in mind when preparing their vessels for Australian waters.Our thanks to Simon Liddy, Glenn O'Brien and Chris Sacré of HWL Ebsworth Lawyers Australia for alerting us to this development.
You may also be interested in:
The Club’s correspondents in Australia, HWL Ebsworth Lawyers, advise of an increase in fines for those polluting Australian waters.
QCR Winter 2018: Carriage of goods by sea — Contract of carriage in charterparty or bill of lading...
Carriage of goods by sea — Contract of carriage in charterparty or bill of lading — Can cargo interests sue under straight bill of lading — Whether voluntary salvors entitled to be rewarded — Whether cargo interests entitled to recover transhipment costs — Whether cargo interests liable to contribute in general average if vessel not seaworthy at the commencement of the voyage
MARPOL Annex V Garbage Record Book - Liberia Publishes two new Garbage Record Books for Ships
The amendments include revised guidelines and format for the Garbage Record Book (GRB) required to be maintained on board ships. The new revised GRB is divided into Parts I & II.
The Polar Code is expected to take effect on 1 January 2017 via amendments to the SOLAS (Safety of Life at Sea) and MARPOL (Prevention of Pollution from Ships) Conventions. The Polar Code also includes recommendations and guidelines relating to the mandatory portions of the Code.