Brexit and the LMAA
The views and opinions expressed here are solely those of the original author or contributor. These views and opinions do not necessarily represent those of the UK P&I Club.
I was lucky enough recently to attend the LMAA dinner held in the lovely Drapers’ Hall. The prevalent theme was whether Brexit would have an impact on London Maritime Arbitration and whether London would retain its crown as a key centre for global maritime dispute resolution. It has been suggested that after Brexit the shipping community may consider other maritime dispute jurisdictions around the world, such as Singapore, over London.
Statistically, in London it is thought that about 2357 maritime arbitrations were handled by the LMAA in 2017 . This shows the number of new matters being referred to arbitration in London under LMAA Terms in 2017 as remaining high notwithstanding current market conditions. London’s biggest competitor, Singapore, saw fewer than 10% of London maritime arbitration cases.
The statistics indicate how strong London is presently. The argument has been raised that Brexit will see developing centres of arbitration such as Paris and Dubai attempting to seize the opportunity to promote maritime arbitration there. To understand how London became the front runner for Maritime Arbitration one must look at why London is currently such a popular forum. English law offers a degree of certainty in that the doctrine of precedent applies and so cases should be dealt consistently.
Doctrines such as privity of contract again make English law a favourable jurisdiction for parties to a contract. Maritime Arbitration in England is a “well-oiled” machine developed from years of experience. This allows for a structured approach to receiving a final decision.
There are certain complexities that may arise following Brexit, for example with enforcement. Following Brexit the Recast Brussels Regulation, which provided for the recognition and enforcement of jurisdiction clauses will fall away. The UK Government is looking into ways around this.
Whilst it seems unlikely that a dramatic shift will occur overnight, especially with London’s well established and respected status, it does seems that some change may be on the horizon and this may lead to growth in other maritime shipping hubs. That said, the current thinking suggests that Brexit will have very little impact on the London Maritime Arbitration community.
You may also be interested in:
Singapore: 47 individuals & 7 companies penalized for breaching COVID-19 related regulations
The Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore (MPA) announced that 47 individuals and 7 companies, including ocean-going vessel interests, were penalized between November 2020 and June 2021 for breaching safe management regulations, apparently related to the COVID-19 (Temporary Measures) Act 2020.
Sophia Bullard, Crew Health Director at UK P&I Club, discusses contact dermatitis, its symptoms as well as its treatment and prevention.
QCR Summer 2021: Enemalta Plc V The Standard Club Asia Ltd (THE “DI MATTEO”)  EWHC 1215 (Comm)
This decision might be of interest to Members who may be involved in jurisdictional arguments in the context of limitation proceedings.
QCR Winter 2021: The Danish Supreme Court - Judgment dated 9th September 2021 (U2021.4943 H)
The Danish Supreme Court rules that a jurisdiction clause in a waybill may under certain circumstances supersede the principal rule of jurisdiction in the Danish Merchant Shipping Act, section 310_1, if the Brussels I regulation was to be applicable to the case.