船長に求められるもの:それは将来を見通す能力

"According to the Belgian Court of Appeal, it would seem that Masters of ships must also be Masters of the unknown - on top of all the other job requirements. Odd? Yes - we thought so, too.
A recent case involving a ship entered in the club involved a cargo of steel plates and coils loaded in China and discharged in the Belgium. Naturally, the ship's voyage involved sailing through different climates. This voyage took place in winter, so she sailed from a cold China, through the warm Singapore straights nearing the equator and then back up into a very cold Europe. This allegedly caused damage to the cargo, for which the receiver sought to recover damages. The owners were seeking to deny liability on the basis that it was not the fault of the ship.
Now, this is not an unusual situation, but the Belgian Court of Appeal clearly thought otherwise! They held that a receiver is relying on the description of the cargo provided by the Master when the goods are loaded. Excellent - that is the situation as we know it. It coincides with the obligations under the Hague-Visby Rules (to which the Netherlands are a signatory) and is not too onerous. So far, so good - but this is where it started to go wrong ...
The Court further held that the receiver is not supposed to have any knowledge regarding the carriage of steel. Anything to do with the transportation is, therefore, completely down to the owners / Master. As such, the Court said that the Master should have described the condition of the cargo taking into account the forthcoming voyage.
So in other words, the Master is expected to clause the bills of lading in accordance with any and every potential change in condition of the cargo caused by and during the voyage. In theory, by the time the damage is done and the cargo reaches the discharge port, it would comply correspond with the description given by the Master at the loading port.
There are so many questions!
How is the Master supposed to predict the potential effects that the voyage will have on the cargo?
What happens if the Master over-estimates the expected effects of the voyage? The cargo would turn up in a better condition than when it was loaded!
What level of knowledge is the Master deemed to have about each and every cargo he is due to carry?
What happens to the poor shipper who has provided cargo in a good condition, then receives a clause bill for damage that hasn't even happened?
How does this decision interact with the obligations under the Hague-Visby Rules - which one prevails
Surely the receiver should know what they are buying, it's characteristics and where they are buying it from?
The owners may be appealing the decision, but if in doubt be sure to talk to the Club!"
You may also be interested in:
通常業務から学ぶ-事故防止の観点から
2023/02/01
重傷や死亡につながった過去の事故事例を調査すると、日々繰り返される通常業務に事故原因があることが多く、その根本原因はリーダーシップの欠如にあるようです。当クラブはメンバーの皆様が積極的かつ体系的に日々の業務を監督し、事故原因となりうる箇所を特定し根絶するために、わかりやすく費用対効果の高い事故防止方法を追求しています。
英国のMRV制度の報告要件が 2025 年に延期
2023/01/12
2021年9月にお伝えした通り、英国MCAは船舶からの温室効果ガス排出量の測定、報告、検証に係る英国MRV制度について、当初2021年末からデータ収集をすることを想定していましたが、運輸省が報告受入れにはさらに準備期間が必要であるとして、収集データの報告義務を2025年まで延期することを発表しました。船舶からの排出量のモニターについての法的要件は引き続き施行されています。
中国:COVID-19感染拡大防止対策についてのアップデート
2023/01/17
中国政府は昨年12月以降、COVID-19感染拡大防止対策を変更し、様々な関連規制を撤廃しました。現在の状況および中国国内の港湾における乗組員交代について等、コレスポンデンツShanghai P&I Services社からの回覧をご確認ください。
カリフォルニア州 - 新しいAt-Berth規則の施行
2023/01/12
2020 年 9月にお知らせした通り、カリフォルニア州大気資源委員会 (CARB) は、着桟中の船舶から排出される有害物質の削減を強化するため、新At-Berth規則を2023年1月1日より施行しました。添付のECM Client Alert 1-2023では、本規則により求められる要件の他にCARBの中間評価レポートおよび本規則についてのFAQ(更新版)などがご確認いただけます。